This is a bit off topic. Sorry.

I liked your study on the Investigative Judgment on 3abn this morning. However, I’m very surprised at your use of the NIV. It has over 5000 omitted words and changed words, and changed doctrines. You tried to make a case for John 5:24, in that the NIV is “more correct” because it says “will not condemn”

John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.

As you can see, the NIV does not translate this any better, unless you count against the archaic renderings of some words. I mainly use the KJV2000 and the AKJV, which does not omit words nor change meanings and doctrines.

John 5:24 Truly, truly, I say to you, He that hears my word, and believes on him that sent me, has everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death to life (AKJV).

John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that hears my word, and believes on him that sent me, has everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life(KJV2000).

Additionally, the NIV does injustice to Daniel 8:14:

Daniel 8:14 (New International Version)
14 He said to me, “It will take 2,300 evenings and mornings; then the sanctuary will be reconsecrated.”

Dan 8:14 And he said unto me, For two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed. (KJV2000)

Reconsecrated does not carry the same meaning as “cleansed.” We know that Jesus cleanses the Most Holy from sin during the IJ. I’m assuming you do believe Jesus entered the Most Holy in 1844? Even if you do agree “cleansed” is correct, it may not help the new believer who wants to study this and has an NIV.

Now to Hebrews:

Hebrews 9:12 (New International Version)
12He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, having obtained eternal redemption.

Here the NIV has Jesus entering the Most Holy at His ascension, I don’t believe that was Paul’s intention under inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Is it any wonder that Desmond Ford likes these liberal Bible versions, and recommends them in relation to the IJ?

Heb 9:12 Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.
(KJV2000)

My opinion is that the NIV actually changes doctrine on these two verses. The original languages also agree. You may also be aware that Hort and Westcott in the 19th century are responsible for making most of the changes to the Minority text, both A and B manuscripts, that although only make up about 6% of old manuscripts, are used for almost all liberal versions, including the NIV.
In addition, Hort and Westcott are also well known to have participated in séances during the times they did this work, so the directions for the changes in Bible versions came from demons. A good book on the subject is: “The King James Bible and Modern Versions,” by Vance Ferrell, which can also be downloaded free on the Amazing Discoveries website.

On today’s sermon, you also made reference to the fact that Satan really attacks the IJ. Yes he does.